Evidence-Based Question Pairs: The Two-Step Strategy
The SAT Reading section includes evidence-based question pairs β a comprehension or inference question followed by a 'which lines best provide evidence for the previous answer?' question. These paired questions are among the most distinctive features of the SAT and require a specific strategy. The naive approach: answer Q1 (comprehension/inference), then look at Q2 answer choices to find supporting lines. The problem: students often lock in an incorrect Q1 answer and then find lines that support that wrong answer in Q2 β producing two wrong answers from one mistake. The two-step strategy: (1) Read all four evidence options in Q2 first. These are specific line ranges. Read each evidence passage excerpt. (2) Ask: 'What claim does each evidence excerpt actually support?' Build a summary for each. (3) Match your evidence summaries to the Q1 answer choices. The Q1 correct answer is the claim that is most directly supported by one of the Q2 evidence excerpts. This reverse approach β starting with evidence and working to claim β eliminates the lock-in problem. Common trap: Q2 evidence that is accurate content from the passage but supports a different question than Q1 asked. The evidence must specifically support the claim in Q1's correct answer β not just be true content. The SAT frequently includes attractive but mismatched pairs.