The play therapy room has always evolved alongside culture — sand trays replaced literal sand dunes, puppets replaced carved figures, and bibliotherapy extended from physical books to audiobooks. The integration of digital apps into play therapy is the current evolution in this line, and it is happening faster than the professional literature can keep pace with. This article synthesizes current evidence, ethical frameworks, and practical guidance for clinicians navigating this terrain.
APT's Position on Technology in Play Therapy
The Association for Play Therapy updated its Paper on Technology in Play Therapy in 2022, acknowledging the significant clinical potential of digital media while maintaining the primacy of the therapeutic relationship. APT's core position: technology in play therapy is not inherently therapeutic — it becomes therapeutic through intentional integration within a relational context where the therapist is actively present, engaged, and facilitating reflection.
APT cautions against technology serving as a substitute for the therapeutic relationship (screens as babysitter during session) and differentiates between technology-assisted play therapy (TaPT), where digital tools actively serve clinical goals, and technology-present sessions, where devices are present but not purposefully integrated.
"The relational aspects of play therapy are not incidental to its effectiveness — they are the mechanism. Technology that strengthens the relational connection is therapeutic; technology that substitutes for it is not." — APT Paper on Technology in Play Therapy (2022)
What Makes an App Therapeutic vs. Educational
The distinction matters clinically and ethically. An educational app is designed to build knowledge or skills; its primary outcome metric is learning. A therapeutic app (or an educational app used therapeutically) supports the client's treatment goals — emotional regulation, trauma processing, social skill development, narrative construction — within the relational context of the therapeutic session.
The same app can be educational in one context and therapeutic in another. A drawing app used by a child at home for fun is educational-adjacent entertainment. The same drawing app used in session as part of a trauma narrative externalization exercise — where the therapist and child collaborate on imagery representing the traumatic experience — is therapeutic. The difference is the intentionality, the relational context, and the clinical reflection that follows.
HIPAA and Third-Party App Considerations
This is an area where many clinicians are unknowingly operating outside compliance. The HIPAA Privacy Rule requires that any vendor who creates, receives, maintains, or transmits Protected Health Information (PHI) on behalf of a covered entity must sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA). Most consumer apps — including most educational apps — are not designed for healthcare use, do not sign BAAs, and explicitly disclaim healthcare use in their terms of service.
Practical Guidelines
- Never enter a client's name, identifying information, or clinical details into a consumer app
- If an app records audio or video during session, obtain explicit informed consent and verify the data is not transmitted to the vendor's servers
- For telehealth sessions where apps are shared via screen sharing, HIPAA-compliant videoconferencing must be the delivery mechanism
- Consult your malpractice insurer before incorporating any new technology into clinical practice
Informed Consent for Digital Tool Use
Informed consent for therapy should explicitly address technology use. Updated consent documentation should describe: what digital tools may be used and for what purpose, what data (if any) is collected by those tools, the therapeutic rationale for technology integration, and the client/guardian's right to decline specific technology use without affecting the therapeutic relationship. For child clients, both guardian consent and developmentally appropriate child assent should be obtained.
Minecraft, Roblox, and Structured Digital Play
A growing body of case literature — including publications in the International Journal of Play Therapy and practitioner reports in the Association for Play Therapy's journal — documents structured therapeutic use of Minecraft and, more recently, Roblox in individual and group play therapy. Documented therapeutic applications include:
- Narrative therapy: Building environments that represent internal experiences, therapeutic metaphors, or trauma timelines
- Social skills groups: Collaborative building tasks requiring turn-taking, negotiation, and repair of ruptures
- Anxiety exposure: In-game challenges as graduated exposure to fear of failure
- Grief and loss: Creating memorials or narrative spaces for processing loss
The essential clinical requirement: the therapist must be present and active during digital play — not observing while the client plays independently, but co-playing, commenting therapeutically, and facilitating reflection on what the play content represents.
Narrative Apps and Bibliotherapy Digital Extension
Interactive narrative apps — choose-your-own-path stories, narrative puzzle games, and character-driven games with moral decision points — offer rich material for therapeutic conversation. Used as a bibliotherapy extension, they allow clinicians to explore clients' identification with characters, choices made under pressure, and moral reasoning in a lower-stakes digital medium before connecting to real-world parallels.
The Digital Sandbox Concept
Several play therapy theorists have developed the concept of the digital sandbox — a digital environment that functions analogously to the physical sandbox in traditional Jungian sandplay therapy. The client constructs a world using digital tools; the therapist observes, occasionally participates, and facilitates post-construction reflection. Minecraft's creative mode is the most commonly used platform, but purpose-built tools are emerging. The theoretical underpinning: the constructed world externalizes internal psychological material in a way that allows observation, reflection, and — over time — reorganization.
Documenting Technology-Assisted Sessions
Progress note documentation for technology-assisted sessions should meet the same clinical and legal standards as any other session. Specific elements to include: the name and type of technology used, the clinical rationale for its selection, a description of the client's engagement and any clinically significant material that emerged, the therapist's interventions in relation to the technology use, and connection to treatment goals.
Supervision Considerations
Supervisors should explicitly address technology use in supervision contracts and sessions. Key supervision questions for technology-integrated practice include: How are you selecting technology tools for specific clients? What is the clinical rationale? How are you ensuring you are not using technology as countertransference avoidance? Supervisors unfamiliar with digital play therapy should seek consultation or training rather than defaulting to prohibition.
Key Takeaways
- APT supports intentional technology integration — not technology as substitute for the therapeutic relationship.
- Consumer apps are not HIPAA-compliant — never collect PHI in apps without a BAA.
- Informed consent must address technology — update documentation to cover digital tool use explicitly.
- Minecraft and Roblox have documented therapeutic applications — with therapist co-present and active throughout.
- Document technology-assisted sessions rigorously — to the same standard as any other clinical activity.
When recommending educational technology for use between sessions, consider platforms designed with child safety in mind — like Koydo's interactive learning library.
Ready to transform your approach? Explore Koydo free today →