Lesson 47 of 69 in this sequence

68%

Not completed yet

Saved on this device only — not synced to an account yet.

Learning path

Step 47 of 69

Continue the sequence

ResumeReturn to this step ReviewRevisit the core idea RemediateGet repair practice Next stepChoose the next lesson manually

Completion

Review objectives and instruction
Complete the activity with manual learner confirmation
Answer every understanding-check item
Show completion feedback and reward only after the learner finishes the check

Progress

Step 47/69
15 content types
AI help source context available
Auto-advance blocked

Review objectives and instruction

AI help

Available only with source grounding, privacy limits, age controls, and measurement.

AI source context

Pick the Right Material for Your Prototype Test · material selection · prototype · design purpose

Evidence: local lesson AI-help metadata only; source-grounding, privacy, age-safety, and measurement hooks do not prove real model quality, production telemetry, child AI approval, or AI tutor production readiness

Production AI readiness not claimed

AI source context

Assessment shape

Local lesson assessment shape is complete.

Local shape only; production answer-attempt telemetry, live ownership/RLS evidence, mastery interpretation, release, and production readiness are not claimed here.

Objectives: 4
Activity: Prompt ready
Quiz items: 4 items, 4 answer keys, 4 explanations
Reward: Completion reward ready

Assessment progress stays manual: do not auto-advance through uncertain answers, failed writes, consent, media, payment, learner choice, or AI-assisted checks.

Learning-loop evidence: Content-map contract only; persistence and production learner-progress writes require route/API evidence.

Manual policy: assessment, media, consent, payment, learner choice, failed writes, and AI-uncertain help stay under learner control.

Prerequisite: Complete or review One Change at a Time: Designing Fair Tests

AI guardrails

Privacy

Do not send raw child free text without consent
Use source excerpts and non-identifying progress state only
Asset is not registry-gated

Age safety

Apply learn audience controls before AI-help claims
Keep child learner AI paths behind guardian/product review evidence before readiness claims

Measurement

Log AI help usage by surface and asset slug
Evaluate answer quality against source-grounded rubric before production-readiness claims
Tie remediation prompts to completion, retry, or review outcomes

Local AI-help guardrails only; they do not prove guardian approval, production telemetry, model evaluation, release, deployment, or AI tutor production readiness.

Source and rights

Source path: koydo-app/scripts/curriculum-authoring
License: ai-generated-koydo
Attribution: Attribution decision needs owner review
AI provenance: claude-opus-4-8

Source review gates: attribution_missing

Local source evidence only; this does not prove publication rights, attribution approval, AI provenance clearance, release, deployment, or production readiness.

Route review

Current route: /library/learn/engineering_making/en/lesson/prototyping-tools-and-materials
Route source: Fallback route needs owner canonical review
Candidate route: /library/learn/engineering_making/en/lesson/prototyping-tools-and-materials

Local route evidence only; fallback candidates need owner-approved canonical route policy before route writes, production discoverability, or readiness claims.

Content gates: canonical_target_web_missing_uses_library_fallback

lessonslessonslesson objectivesmedia scenesdrillspractice setsquizzesfeedbackcharacterscitationsconcept mapsprogressresumereviewremediationnext steps

Pick the Right Material for Your Prototype Test

with Atlas

Atlas stands at a makerspace workbench wearing safety glasses, holding a cardboard bottle-holder next to a ruler and a tablet showing a simple sketch, ready to show which material fits the test.

Define a prototype as a testable model built to answer one design question
Match a material to a prototype's specific test purpose
Explain why cheap and fast materials are often the best first choice
Identify at least one common material-choice mistake and state why it fails

Key terms

Prototype: A testable model built to answer one design question
Material selection: Choosing a material that fits the test's purpose
Shape test: A check of form and fit using quick materials
Strength test: A check of how much load a design holds

The Question Picks the Material

Every prototype exists to answer one specific question, and that question decides what to build it from. A shape or fit question calls for cardboard, foam, or paper because they are cheap and fast to cut and recut. A strength question calls for foam board, balsa, or thick plastic that can carry load. Matching the material to today's question, not to the final product, keeps you learning fast and cheaply.

Cheap and Fast Wins Early

Early prototypes should use the cheapest thing that can survive a single test. Reaching for polished aluminum or finished plastic before the shape is confirmed locks money and time into a choice you have not validated, an appearance-first bias that slows the whole project. A rough, ugly model that answers the question is more valuable than a beautiful one that arrives too late to change anything.

Worked examples

You want to test whether a water-bottle holder is the right shape to grip a bottle. Choose and justify a material.

Identify the question: this is a shape and fit test, not a strength test.
Match material to question: shape tests want a cheap, fast-to-cut material.
Reject premature upgrades: aluminum cannot answer a shape question better than cardboard and costs far more.

Answer: Cardboard, because it is cheap and fast to cut and reshape for a shape test.

Hi, I'm Atlas. Before you build anything, ask yourself one question: what exactly am I testing? That question decides your material. A prototype is a testable model — not a finished product. Its whole job is to answer one question about your design. Are you testing shape? Are you testing strength? Are you testing fit? Each question points to a different material. Testing shape or fit? Grab cardboard, foam, or paper. They are cheap, easy to cut, and fast to change when the first try is not quite right. Spending money on metal or polished plastic before you have confirmed the shape is a common mistake — it locks you into a choice before you have learned anything. Testing strength or stiffness? Move up to foam board, balsa wood, or thick plastic sheet. These hold load while still being light and cuttable with basic tools. Building a digital tool? A screen wireframe on paper or a tablet is your 'material' — quick to sketch, quick to erase. The rule is simple: match the material to the question you are answering today, not to what the final product will look like someday. If you ever feel stuck, pick the cheapest thing that can survive one test.

Activity

Sort each material card into the test purpose it fits best: Shape Test or Strength Test

Practice

Decide whether balsa wood fits a shape test or a strength test and explain.

Your first prototype looks rough and uneven, so what should you do next?

Common mistakes to avoid

A prototype must look finishedA prototype's job is to be tested and learned from, so a rough model that answers the question is enough.
Pick the final-product material firstChoosing a fancy material for looks too early is appearance-first bias that wastes time before the design is validated.

Check your understanding

What is the main purpose of a prototype in the design process?

You want to test only whether your new water-bottle holder is the right SHAPE to grip a bottle. Which material is the best first choice?

Which action shows safe AND accurate fabrication when building a prototype?

Your first prototype looks rough and uneven. What should you do?

Recap

A prototype is a testable model built to answer one design question, so you match the material to that question, choosing cheap and fast options like cardboard for shape and sturdier ones for strength, rather than picking the final-product material too early.

Reflect

When have you polished something before checking whether the basic idea even worked?